Green Hydrogen & RFNBO Criteria

Institute of Energy Economics at the University of Cologne gGmbH (EWI). Green hydrogen production under RFNBO criteria ‐ Analyzing the system and business case perspective.

Today I took a closer look at a new EWI study: “Green hydrogen production under RFNBO criteria – Analyzing the system and business case perspective” (2025).

✅ Key Takeaways:

This analysis examines the impact of the RFNBO criteria on green hydrogen production from system and business perspectives, with particular attention to how the criteria affect costs, capacity expansion, and the need for system flexibility.

📌 From a system perspective:

  • Implementing all RFNBO criteria increases electrolysis capacity by over 3% across Europe to meet predefined demand, while average full-load hours decline by around 200 hours.
  • Applying all RFNBO criteria with hourly matching increases average hydrogen supply costs by around 10 EUR/MWh (+8%) across Europe, driven primarily by additionality requirements and the shift from daily to hourly matching.
  • In Germany, expected to be the largest hydrogen offtaker in Europe, the impact on marginal hydrogen costs is higher than the EU average (+16%).
  • These effects highlight distributional impacts between sectors: while marginal electricity costs decline due to surplus renewables entering the market, additional system costs remain within the hydrogen sector. This implies a cost shift from electricity consumers to hydrogen producers.
  • Average EU electricity costs fall by around 5%, and marginal CO₂ certificate costs by around 2%.
  • Applying all RFNBO criteria adds over 25 GWel of additional RES capacity across Europe. In Germany, total installed RES capacity increases by 17%.
  • Adding RFNBO criteria reallocates capacities from the electricity market to hydrogen production.
  • With stricter temporal correlation requirements, hydrogen production increasingly relies on RES with high full-load hours (onshore and offshore wind), leaving more volatile solar generation to the electricity market.

📌 From a business perspective:

  • Tighter matching requirements push portfolios toward dedicated renewables and short-term flexibility.
  • Under Hourly Matching and a baseload supply profile, PV is often combined with large batteries; adding hydrogen storage can shift flexibility from the electricity sector to the hydrogen sector.
  • Results show that LCOH are more sensitive to constraints from the business perspective: in the baseline, they rise from around 150 EUR/MWh (No Criteria) to almost 180 EUR/MWh (Hourly Matching), an increase of +19%, with the largest jump occurring between Daily and Hourly Matching.
  • Sensitivity analyses reveal a much stronger impact than in the system perspective, especially under Hourly Matching, where LCOH range from about 170 EUR/MWh up to 370 EUR/MWh.
  • The difference between Monthly and Hourly Matching spans from roughly 15 EUR/MWh to over 90 EUR/MWh.

➡️ Source: EWI (2025). Green hydrogen production under RFNBO criteria ‐ Analyzing the system and business case perspective.

Case studies on hydrogen produced from biomass

Synergies of green hydrogen and biobased value chains deployment. Report WP2: Case studies on hydrogen produced from biomass

The new report “Synergies of green hydrogen and biobased value chains deployment. Report WP2: Case studies on hydrogen produced from biomass” was released by the Inter-Task Project Synergies of Green Hydrogen and Biobased Value Chains.

The report explores technology options for producing biomass-based hydrogen (biohydrogen) and their respective technology readiness levels.

✅ Regulatory context

  • It is important to underline that biohydrogen does not qualify as renewable hydrogen or renewable fuel of non-biological origin (RFNBO) under the Renewable Energy Directive (RED III), since biomass is explicitly excluded from the definition of RFNBO.
  • RED III: ‘renewable fuels of non-biological origin’ means liquid and gaseous fuels the energy content of which is derived from renewable sources other than biomass;
  • Nevertheless, the report provides valuable insights into how different biomass conversion technologies could contribute to hydrogen and commodity production.
Main conversion processes to produce hydrogen from biomass sources

Figure: Main conversion processes to produce hydrogen from biomass sources (based on Buffi et.al 2022)

Source: Report “Synergies of green hydrogen and biobased value chains deployment”

☑️ Key findings of the report

  • Biohydrogen can be produced through several conversion routes, using a wide range of biogenic feedstocks.
  • Feedstock options vary from low-grade materials (wastewater, forestry and agricultural residues) to higher quality feedstocks (bioethanol, biomethane).
  • Many production concepts deliver additional co-products, such as biochar, biocarbon, or biomethane, and in some cases CO₂ streams that could enable negative emissions.
  • Case studies provide detailed assessments of technology readiness, economic fundamentals, climate impacts, and their potential role in the energy system.

✅ Status of development

  • All production concepts examined remain at the development stage (TRL 4–7) and none has yet reached full commercialization.
  • The report highlights both the opportunities and the barriers for scaling these technologies.

☑️ Takeaway

  • While biohydrogen will not play a role in fulfilling RED III targets for RFNBO, it may provide complementary pathways for decarbonisation and resource efficiency, particularly if integrated into biobased value chains with multiple outputs.

➡️ Source: Report “Synergies of green hydrogen and biobased value chains deployment”

Bringing Hydrogen to the EU Market

In this episode of Clean Energy Talks video blog with Joris Vlasblom, an experienced energy advisor specializing in hydrogen, renewable energy, and Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF), we talk about bringing hydrogen to the EU Market:

I. EU Hydrogen Targets & Demand

How do you assess the current demand for hydrogen and its derivatives in the EU?

How aligned is the current market demand with the EU’s hydrogen targets for 2030 and beyond?

II. Market Entry & Readiness

What are the biggest challenges to bringing hydrogen into the EU market today?

III. Certifications & Standards

How can producers confirm the compliance of hydrogen with EU market requirements?

How crucial is the RFNBO certification for accessing the EU market?

IV. Infrastructure & Technology

What infrastructure gaps (e.g. ports, pipelines, storage) are most urgent to address?

V. Practical Solutions

What are some practical steps companies should take when planning to enter the EU hydrogen market?

➡️ Reach out here on LinkedIn or contact me for more details on the video topic.